Tuesday, April 7, 2015

DAAN NG KRUS, The Musicale: PHILIPPINE OBERAMMERGAU

By Wilhelmina S. Orozco 



Watching Daan ng Krus, the Musicale is a rare treat at the Open Air Auditorium of the Rizal Park, last Sunday, April 5th. Although it started late, still it was watched by a full house of promenaders.



Image result for kiss of Judas paintingImage result for kiss of Judas painting caravaggio


Actually, the play is about the life of Christ, from the time Virgin Mary conceives him through the agency of an angel who has told her that she has been chosen to be the bearer of Jesus , up to the time of the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ.

Spiced up with songs and acrobatic dancing of the members of Teatro Mensaheros Actors Ensemble, the Musicale was able to capture the attention of the public who must have been hungry for significant, relevant and meaningful dramas in the country.

The songs contained morally correct lyrics and the melodies  were free-composed, meaning they did not have a definite form.  Listening to them, you would not be able to memorize any because they are not the familiar popsong type of music that could have only two stanzas and then a repetitive refrain. No, it’s not that at all, except for the last song, “Papuri” which had repeats several times at the end of the play.

However, the background accompaniment of the songs is rather impressive, although I think it was not an orchestra that was recorded, but rather a synthesiser with varying instruments. 

Obviously, the composer is schooled in music. However, may I say that it did not depict the music during Christ’s time. Chanting which is a common song during the medieval age could have provided the proper atmosphere for the life of Christ, as the play had a trend towards realistic depiction of Christ. This is unlike Jesus Christ Superstar, the movie which had costumes that were really outlandish, and songs that were rock from beginning to end.

Regarding acting, I must say that the Christ actor looked very phlegmatic. He seemed to have had a hard time holding his scarf, so he could not wave his arms freely, as when he got angry over the vendors at the temple. Although he had a good singing voice, his acting left much to be desired. As Christ, he could have had a good role to really manifest goodness, strength of character versus Mephistopheles or Lucifer, and then irony towards Judas. Or maybe, I am putting in my own interpretation of how Christ should have been depicted.

The costumes were mostly pale – gray, black, a few colored ones like Mary’s blue dress over white, and the prostitutes which had sequins thrown over their sexy hula-like dresses. Over-all, from a distance of 50 feet away, as I was at the back of the auditorium, I had to exert effort to distinguish the characters, whether they were the devilish or the good crowd. I think that the costume designer should have delineated through colors and lines who the priest are, Christ, the crowd, etcetera. Moreover, the transformation of the prostitutes from being bad to good was rather too quick.

Scriptwise, the play hewed closely to the Biblical narration of Christ’s life. However, the songs did not convey the highlights of his life. The play was linear if we may depict it, without highs or lows. And so, it lacked suspense and dramatic moments. I think that although the music was well-composed, it did not present much difference to distinguish which acts of Christ were good, and which were strong towards those against him.

Settings-wise,  it was highly creative to have panels of stones painted maroon and flesh which moved around, whether to change a scene, or show a group of faces watching a particular scene onstage. However, in the long run, it proved to be too monotonous watching those panels. “Wala na bang ibang maipapakita?” is the question. I am sure, being Cavitenos, the actors could find many ideas from their province to use as props or setting items to make their stage more attractive.

I am wondering why Christ is alone when he is captured by the guards of the priests. Judas said, “Hahalikan ko ang dadakpin nyo.” I was thinking then that Judas said that because the priests did not know the face of Jesus but it in the play, Christ was alone. So “isa lang ang dadakpin nila doon,” whereas in the Bible, it is said that there were other disciples around when Christ was kissed by Judas.

A scene was devoted to Pedro as he denies his being a disciple of Christ. His costume could stand a bit of design so that he would be visible right away. As was shown, his costume was highly similar to that of the crowd. So watching the play, again from that far place, it was difficult to see which one was Peter singing his song.

During the last scene, when Christ  was carrying the cross and was being pulled among the crowd, the song had lyrics “Ipako sa Krus,” repeated again and again. Over and on top of that was the chanting lament of Mary. I liked that song very much.

Over-all I must say that it was feat producing that play. It is an epic, and very specially good as it was written in Pilipino. So the audience must have really swarmed towards the middle part actually because the words could be easily understood.

Here is wishing Ms.Gie Arnold and her office, the Cultural and Public Affairs Division of the National parks Development Committee would continue to showcase truly original works so that we could have our own Oberammergau.*


*Oberammergau is a municipality in the district of Garmisch-Partenkirchen, in BavariaGermany. The town is famous for its production of a Passion Play, its woodcarvers, and the NATO School.
The Oberammergau Passion Play was first performed in 1634 and is the result of a vow made by the inhabitants of the village that if God spared them from the effects of the bubonic plague then sweeping the region they would perform a passion play every ten years. The play is now performed in years ending with a zero, as well as in 1934 which was the 300th anniversary and 1984 which was the 350th anniversary (though the 1940 performance was cancelled because of the intervention of the Second World War). It involves over 2000 actors, singers, instrumentalists and technicians, all residents of the village.
Oberammergau Passion Play 2010[edit]
About half the inhabitants of Oberammergau took part in the once-a-decade Passion Play in 2010.
This means that over 2,000 villagers brought the story of Jesus to life for the audiences that flocked in from around the world. The play started with Jesus entering Jerusalem, continued with his death on the cross and finished with the resurrection. As ever, this was an extraordinary community enterprise, in which only natives of the village could participate.
2010 saw a new production directed by Oberammergau native Christian Stückl, director at Munich's noted Volkstheater. He was supported by the artistic team that along with him staged the 2000 Passion Play: deputy director and dramatic adviser Otto Huber, set and costume designer Stefan Hageneier and music director Marxus Zwink and conductor Michael Bocklet - all from Oberammergau. The play started each day at 14.30 and including a three-hour supper interval ended at 22.30: an innovation, since previous productions had been performed in the morning and afternoon with a break for lunch. Performances took place between mid-May and early October 2010.
-       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberammergau







No comments: