Tuesday, November 29, 2011
ON INTELLECTUAL COPYRIGHT
By Wilhelmina S. Orozco
Folks, sometime in 2007, our organization, Diwata Society of Women in Philosophy and Education put up a seminar-workshop for inventors, containing topics about tapping their creativity, ideas about marketing and distributing as well as promoting their products. It was very successful as it was funded by the TAPI of the Department of Science and Technology.
This year, I was asked by one of the participants to repeat that seminar-workshop and so I proposed the same project to TAPI. After evaluation, the committee wrote me to say that they have a similar program. Where did they get that except from our own project?
Now I am wondering if the Intellectual Property Office should step in and say that this is a case of intellectual piracy. Who will protect us from the government when it appropriates ideas of the NGOs, allowing the staff to use the same ideas and methods of imparting knowledge.
This is a ticklish issue but I am bringing it up because it seems that as we in the non-government movement think of new ideas, suddenly, the government is appropriating them and then leaving us in the cold to look for funds abroad.
My goodness! Lawyers help!!!
Generosity During Christmas, (edited)
(Folks sorry for the mistakes below. I have edited them, though. Thanks for your patience.)
by Wilhelmina S. Orozco
Christmas is a very important event in the lives of the Filipino people. It's a time for gathering all relatives, related directly and indirectly; a time for children to enjoy being hugged and kissed like the baby Jesus in the manger. No where else do we get our sense of family ties than in the idea of Christmas.
The humble beginnings of Christ make us look towards Christmas as a time for caring for those who have less in life. We find ways to bring them gifts, no matter how cheap just so they could feel special. Although some poor people would dare ask, "Nasaan ang regalo ko?" rather brazenly, we always take it in stride. It is a given, an obligation on the part of those who have been lucky to have been born with parents who looked after their future, to to those who are conscientized to show their generosity, no matter what the costs.
Of course, as the years have passed, our idea of Christmas has become rather commercial, which I really rue very much. I do think that we should have more concerts at shopping malls, and Santa Clauses greeting children without necessarily asking them what you want for Christmas. Santas should ask children, "How will you spend Christmas? Would you like to give something to the poor children? Do you have poor friends? How will you make them happy?"
I do think that inculcating nurturing feelings start at home and in our surroundings. Children must be taught not only to take and take during Christmas but also give and give, not really to the point of hurting.
This morning, I heard over the radio that there is a flux of arrivals at the airport -- our OFWs, mga kababayan who will spend Christmas here. I am trying to stop my tears from falling because I know how difficult it is for them to be separated from their families. I spent Christmas in London, twice, in LA once and in New York once and I felt the pangs of loneliness, except when I went with friends to hear mass at some Catholic Churches. Otherwise, it is quite lonely because Christmas does not seem to be popular in the west, except Thanksgiving. Greeting someone "Merry Christmas!" sounds very perfunctory there and I can feel that Christianity -- although friends are very generous -- is not really a key word. Generosity is practiced but to attribute it to Christ does not seem to be followed at all.
Anyway, let us make this Christmas the happiest for all our kababayan coming home. Every home window let us decorate with welcome home banners to signify to them that we miss them a lot, and wish this administration could make the return of all OFWs to our homecountry be realized within its term -- providing them decent jobs with salaries that could equal if not approximate what they are now earning abroad.
I also heard over the radio that government employees will be receiving their Christmas bonuses, 13th month pay, amounting to P10,000 ++. That is a lot of money for buying food to be eaten on Christmas day. Maybe the government could suspend the imposition of the VAT and EVAT this December so that all prices of goods, especially food and travel, would go down and allow our kababayan to enjoy Christmas gastronomically.
But to really make the Christmas season meaningful, I do think that PNoy could really touch the hearts of the people if he gives us a reprieve from the skyrocketing prices of utilities, oil and basic necessities. We deserve that don't we? After all we have been singing Hallelujiah to the administration ever since it assumed power. We have been very peaceful and caring of each other, except some recalcitrants in Mindanao.
We must realize heaven on earth, not just by looking at the pictures and exhibits of the Nativity everywhere. everyone to enjoy the season.
So help us God.
by Wilhelmina S. Orozco
Christmas is a very important event in the lives of the Filipino people. It's a time for gathering all relatives, related directly and indirectly; a time for children to enjoy being hugged and kissed like the baby Jesus in the manger. No where else do we get our sense of family ties than in the idea of Christmas.
The humble beginnings of Christ make us look towards Christmas as a time for caring for those who have less in life. We find ways to bring them gifts, no matter how cheap just so they could feel special. Although some poor people would dare ask, "Nasaan ang regalo ko?" rather brazenly, we always take it in stride. It is a given, an obligation on the part of those who have been lucky to have been born with parents who looked after their future, to to those who are conscientized to show their generosity, no matter what the costs.
Of course, as the years have passed, our idea of Christmas has become rather commercial, which I really rue very much. I do think that we should have more concerts at shopping malls, and Santa Clauses greeting children without necessarily asking them what you want for Christmas. Santas should ask children, "How will you spend Christmas? Would you like to give something to the poor children? Do you have poor friends? How will you make them happy?"
I do think that inculcating nurturing feelings start at home and in our surroundings. Children must be taught not only to take and take during Christmas but also give and give, not really to the point of hurting.
This morning, I heard over the radio that there is a flux of arrivals at the airport -- our OFWs, mga kababayan who will spend Christmas here. I am trying to stop my tears from falling because I know how difficult it is for them to be separated from their families. I spent Christmas in London, twice, in LA once and in New York once and I felt the pangs of loneliness, except when I went with friends to hear mass at some Catholic Churches. Otherwise, it is quite lonely because Christmas does not seem to be popular in the west, except Thanksgiving. Greeting someone "Merry Christmas!" sounds very perfunctory there and I can feel that Christianity -- although friends are very generous -- is not really a key word. Generosity is practiced but to attribute it to Christ does not seem to be followed at all.
Anyway, let us make this Christmas the happiest for all our kababayan coming home. Every home window let us decorate with welcome home banners to signify to them that we miss them a lot, and wish this administration could make the return of all OFWs to our homecountry be realized within its term -- providing them decent jobs with salaries that could equal if not approximate what they are now earning abroad.
I also heard over the radio that government employees will be receiving their Christmas bonuses, 13th month pay, amounting to P10,000 ++. That is a lot of money for buying food to be eaten on Christmas day. Maybe the government could suspend the imposition of the VAT and EVAT this December so that all prices of goods, especially food and travel, would go down and allow our kababayan to enjoy Christmas gastronomically.
But to really make the Christmas season meaningful, I do think that PNoy could really touch the hearts of the people if he gives us a reprieve from the skyrocketing prices of utilities, oil and basic necessities. We deserve that don't we? After all we have been singing Hallelujiah to the administration ever since it assumed power. We have been very peaceful and caring of each other, except some recalcitrants in Mindanao.
We must realize heaven on earth, not just by looking at the pictures and exhibits of the Nativity everywhere. everyone to enjoy the season.
So help us God.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
WHEN WRITINGS BECOME OPPRESSIVE
Wilhelmina S. Orozco
NEWS ORGANIZATIONS had a heyday when Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was photographed by the police as a record of her arrest for Philippine electoral sabotage in 2007. What particularly caught my attention though was the mentioning of former President Estrada’s incarceration, a parallel narration of his past record, and complete with a mugshot in one newspaper, side by side with GMA's case. A TV news broadcaster reported the same topic heavily.
History of Philippine Journalism
Journalists in our country have a long history dating back to the Spanish era when the revolutionaries were printing their own newspaper questioning the colonial policies in the country. Then during the American period, the journalism field flourished especially in the English writing sector. Many columnists and writers learned the craft easily as their were printed liberally by English newspapers. It was only during martial law that the journalistic field in our country found itself in a quandary: whether to accept or reject the administration. Accepting it was allowing itself to be told, and/or be paid handsomely, by the powers-that-be. Rejecting it was facing the consequences of censorship by the newspaper owners, or arrest and incarceration by the military under Marcos orders.
As some media practitioners pondered over their fate, others, however, were showing their bravery, writing for the underground press or putting out papers that were highly critical of that administration, never mind if they were just mimeographed. Malaya newspaper under Jose Burgos was a prime example of brave journalism at that time. Later on when Cory came into the picture, the mosquito press came about like the Mr. and Ms. which gave the true picture of the country fearlessly. However, when Cory defeated Marcos who then had fled and was flown to Hawaii by the Americans, Philippine newspaper history changed altogether – the mosquito press which flourished during the anti-dictatorship campaigns were able to strengthen their foothold in our shores while those who catered to the previous administration became more open about printing the various sides of issues. The latter was able to exist during martial law and afterwards, showing the business acumen of their publishers. "Know when to ride with the tide."
By the way, the role of media during martial law was particularly acute -- I myself had to postpone my academic pursuits in Masters in Communication in Ateneo at that time. I had asked myself then -- what is more important, studying to get a diploma or practicing communication truthfully?
Today, we are faced again with questions about the role of media in history, in society. Will media continue to be brave in reporting issues? What are the boundaries of being brave? Should being sensationalist in the treatment of issues be part of that principle to make courageous writings?
Victim Questions: Does a person who has served his/her sentence and released already have any right to protection of his/her reputation, that is his/her record no longer being mentioned at all? Does such a person have any right to question this enumeration or renarration ad nauseam again of his/her past record, including the printing of his/her police photo appearing as if he/she were a criminal who has just been arrested?
Media Questions: Are media objectives to uphold the truth, accuracy and objectivity boundless? When is a news report biased against the subject instead of being principled?
I think that there is a world of difference in treating the case of GMA and that of Pres. Estrada. The case of GMA is ongoing, and therefore the readers are entitled to know fresh events happening. However, to run that parallel to a narration of the past, does not look objective anymore. Using parallelism is a reporter's and/or editor's bias.
That parallelism is meant to lump the cases of the two as both criminals. The first is still being tried, while the other has already served his sentence, been pardoned and released, and is leading a private life.
Question: Doesn’t anyone who has served sentence no longer deserve respect in the media? Is it necessary to harp on Pres. Estrada’s past record despite the fact that he served already his sentence?
Knowledge and bias
A newspaper report can produce two things: knowledge and bias. Knowledge is that which a reader gets – the who, what, why, where, how and why of issues and events. Bias is that attitude produced from a write-up which is slanted, lacking in facts or shortcutting of facts. A biased attitude can result in distorted opinions, and for the public to hold such is to make them a fertile ground for dictatorship again, in this case, media dictatorship.
The Society of Professional Journalists has a Preamble to its Code of Ethics which states:
...public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.
I am really wondering where fairness and honesty exist in the case above-mentioned. Putting a parallelism between the case of GMA and that of Pres. Estrada is definitely a reporter’s bias. In fact, it is highly questionable why the need to reiterate the charges against him, or why reprint his police photo.
Anyway, is there room for biased reporting in media? None of course. GMA committed a political misbehavior, a negative political practice which robbed the people of votes and that great chance to choose our own leaders. Pres. Estrada’s was economic in nature, and the funds involved were not even public money. GMA is about to serve her sentence, if ever she will be sentenced, whereas Pres. Estrada is already through with that.
Corollary to the above questions: Can an ex-prisoner not become an ordinary person upon release, possessing his/her human rights without being reminded, and the public being told of his past again and again?
Where lies compassion in our society?
Where lies media objectivity now? I do think that if Philippine journalism has to prosper, it must adhere sensitively to media principles, constantly conduct self-introspection, and be always alert to not using media for self-aggrandizement, nor for subtly oppressing people , but rather to use media for educating the readers to ethical political directions and considerations, thus empowering them as human rights literate activists.
NEWS ORGANIZATIONS had a heyday when Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was photographed by the police as a record of her arrest for Philippine electoral sabotage in 2007. What particularly caught my attention though was the mentioning of former President Estrada’s incarceration, a parallel narration of his past record, and complete with a mugshot in one newspaper, side by side with GMA's case. A TV news broadcaster reported the same topic heavily.
History of Philippine Journalism
Journalists in our country have a long history dating back to the Spanish era when the revolutionaries were printing their own newspaper questioning the colonial policies in the country. Then during the American period, the journalism field flourished especially in the English writing sector. Many columnists and writers learned the craft easily as their were printed liberally by English newspapers. It was only during martial law that the journalistic field in our country found itself in a quandary: whether to accept or reject the administration. Accepting it was allowing itself to be told, and/or be paid handsomely, by the powers-that-be. Rejecting it was facing the consequences of censorship by the newspaper owners, or arrest and incarceration by the military under Marcos orders.
As some media practitioners pondered over their fate, others, however, were showing their bravery, writing for the underground press or putting out papers that were highly critical of that administration, never mind if they were just mimeographed. Malaya newspaper under Jose Burgos was a prime example of brave journalism at that time. Later on when Cory came into the picture, the mosquito press came about like the Mr. and Ms. which gave the true picture of the country fearlessly. However, when Cory defeated Marcos who then had fled and was flown to Hawaii by the Americans, Philippine newspaper history changed altogether – the mosquito press which flourished during the anti-dictatorship campaigns were able to strengthen their foothold in our shores while those who catered to the previous administration became more open about printing the various sides of issues. The latter was able to exist during martial law and afterwards, showing the business acumen of their publishers. "Know when to ride with the tide."
By the way, the role of media during martial law was particularly acute -- I myself had to postpone my academic pursuits in Masters in Communication in Ateneo at that time. I had asked myself then -- what is more important, studying to get a diploma or practicing communication truthfully?
Today, we are faced again with questions about the role of media in history, in society. Will media continue to be brave in reporting issues? What are the boundaries of being brave? Should being sensationalist in the treatment of issues be part of that principle to make courageous writings?
Victim Questions: Does a person who has served his/her sentence and released already have any right to protection of his/her reputation, that is his/her record no longer being mentioned at all? Does such a person have any right to question this enumeration or renarration ad nauseam again of his/her past record, including the printing of his/her police photo appearing as if he/she were a criminal who has just been arrested?
Media Questions: Are media objectives to uphold the truth, accuracy and objectivity boundless? When is a news report biased against the subject instead of being principled?
I think that there is a world of difference in treating the case of GMA and that of Pres. Estrada. The case of GMA is ongoing, and therefore the readers are entitled to know fresh events happening. However, to run that parallel to a narration of the past, does not look objective anymore. Using parallelism is a reporter's and/or editor's bias.
That parallelism is meant to lump the cases of the two as both criminals. The first is still being tried, while the other has already served his sentence, been pardoned and released, and is leading a private life.
Question: Doesn’t anyone who has served sentence no longer deserve respect in the media? Is it necessary to harp on Pres. Estrada’s past record despite the fact that he served already his sentence?
Knowledge and bias
A newspaper report can produce two things: knowledge and bias. Knowledge is that which a reader gets – the who, what, why, where, how and why of issues and events. Bias is that attitude produced from a write-up which is slanted, lacking in facts or shortcutting of facts. A biased attitude can result in distorted opinions, and for the public to hold such is to make them a fertile ground for dictatorship again, in this case, media dictatorship.
The Society of Professional Journalists has a Preamble to its Code of Ethics which states:
...public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.
I am really wondering where fairness and honesty exist in the case above-mentioned. Putting a parallelism between the case of GMA and that of Pres. Estrada is definitely a reporter’s bias. In fact, it is highly questionable why the need to reiterate the charges against him, or why reprint his police photo.
Anyway, is there room for biased reporting in media? None of course. GMA committed a political misbehavior, a negative political practice which robbed the people of votes and that great chance to choose our own leaders. Pres. Estrada’s was economic in nature, and the funds involved were not even public money. GMA is about to serve her sentence, if ever she will be sentenced, whereas Pres. Estrada is already through with that.
Corollary to the above questions: Can an ex-prisoner not become an ordinary person upon release, possessing his/her human rights without being reminded, and the public being told of his past again and again?
Where lies compassion in our society?
Where lies media objectivity now? I do think that if Philippine journalism has to prosper, it must adhere sensitively to media principles, constantly conduct self-introspection, and be always alert to not using media for self-aggrandizement, nor for subtly oppressing people , but rather to use media for educating the readers to ethical political directions and considerations, thus empowering them as human rights literate activists.
Thursday, November 17, 2011
ON SHADOW GOVERNMENTS
by Wilhelmina S. Orozco
What is the purpose of a government? A GOVERNMENT EXISTS TO PROTECT
THE PEOPLE, THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, AND EXISTING SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT.
The run of political events in our country shows that there are
several groups attempting to create their own worlds of power to run
their own principles for existence,.
The worst are the underground governments wanting to co-exist with the
existing administration of PNoy. They even have military power
challenging the capacity of the state to protect itself from sabotage
and political destabilization.
The Philippines is entering a new era after more than a decade of
manipulation of elite groups out to make an economic killing out of
being in positions of political power.
Our people have grown politically mature by the strong and fierce
debates on many issues which have a bearing on our ability to choose
our own leaders electorally, on the women’s right to decide on when to
get pregnant, on when to allow the elctions to occur in Mindanao ARMM,
and even minor issues like texting taxes and increase of toll fees in
super highways.
The existing administration cannot ignore the people’s demand now to
hear the call for the clearing of the real issues on what happened in
the 2004 and 2007 ewlections. It is saddled with the responsibility to
look after the past, the present and the future of the country. It is
not true that it should only concern itself with creating jobs,
increasing the taxes collected, and making the peso rise in purchasing
power. It has that larger role to show to the people that past errors
and manipulation to capture electoral powers are unpardonable crimes
that have to be rectified. This is the only way for the country to
move forward.
However, we need to be vigilant against shadow governments that seek
to return to or maintain the power of ill elements in our society.
They are out to destabilize the present administration and eventually
install or reinstall their corrupt leaders.
What is the purpose of a government? A GOVERNMENT EXISTS TO PROTECT
THE PEOPLE, THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, AND EXISTING SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT.
The run of political events in our country shows that there are
several groups attempting to create their own worlds of power to run
their own principles for existence,.
The worst are the underground governments wanting to co-exist with the
existing administration of PNoy. They even have military power
challenging the capacity of the state to protect itself from sabotage
and political destabilization.
The Philippines is entering a new era after more than a decade of
manipulation of elite groups out to make an economic killing out of
being in positions of political power.
Our people have grown politically mature by the strong and fierce
debates on many issues which have a bearing on our ability to choose
our own leaders electorally, on the women’s right to decide on when to
get pregnant, on when to allow the elctions to occur in Mindanao ARMM,
and even minor issues like texting taxes and increase of toll fees in
super highways.
The existing administration cannot ignore the people’s demand now to
hear the call for the clearing of the real issues on what happened in
the 2004 and 2007 ewlections. It is saddled with the responsibility to
look after the past, the present and the future of the country. It is
not true that it should only concern itself with creating jobs,
increasing the taxes collected, and making the peso rise in purchasing
power. It has that larger role to show to the people that past errors
and manipulation to capture electoral powers are unpardonable crimes
that have to be rectified. This is the only way for the country to
move forward.
However, we need to be vigilant against shadow governments that seek
to return to or maintain the power of ill elements in our society.
They are out to destabilize the present administration and eventually
install or reinstall their corrupt leaders.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
OF DREAMS AND DESTINIES
OF DREAMS AND DESTINIES
By Wilhelmina S. Orozco
Why do we suffer from the same problems all the time: poverty, violence, and apathy to what is going on around us?
I think that these problems stem from our lack of will power or inherent weakness of our will power to solve our problems now. By now I mean with greater resolve to solve them today and everyday.
Now why do we lack that will power? Actually so many factors are impinging on our minds, affecting our hearts and behavior, which weaken, slow down, and even deaden our minds all the time. These are brought about by institutional, environmental and violent forces in our country.
As we know, will power is that capacity to volunteer, to act on our life, the realities around us with great decisiveness. But we are not given the opportunity to that all the time. Instead we are made to kowtow, to use other people, to depend on others in order to get what we want, to get the necessary changes that we need in our lives.
There is so much power-wielding in our society that the people lose that inertia, to initiate changes themselves. Power-wielders either have political or economic clout.
What are the examples of these?
Hence the so-called people power is being weakened by these power-wielders and thus has become a relic of our past.
Thus the minds of our people are slowly being attuned to the idea that initiating changes, making moves to rise above the current realities is a losing proposition, “suntok sa buwan” or a product of the imagination not worthy of being pursued at all. People begin to think that corrupt or evil ways are “normal” occurrences and that they form part of life.
People who occupy high places in society, although crooked in their ways, are called “maabilidad,” or “wa-is,” or “pana-panahon lang yan,” meaning each one, whether good or evil will have their own chance in being victorious in whatever manner. In other words, the people have gotten so used to corrupt ways that they now view them as part of living in our society.
So much losses have occurred already in our society – lives, our natural resources, and our greatest resource – the intellectual products put out by inventors, authors, and all creative people.
Lives have been lost due to gangsterism, literally and figuratively. Gang violence is rampant causing the loss of human lives. Political gangsterism has made installing “fake officials” official. Drug taking has created a toll on the minds of the young people, making them lose their directions in life.
Our natural resources are being depleted with nary any benefit to our people. We are losing our trees as a consequence of which floods occur that cause in turn loss of lives and properties. Our air is polluted causing illnesses which our people cannot even afford to cure by themselves. Our seas, which are great sources of marine life, are not well-taken care of. Other nations are even entering our archipelagic boundaries depleting our marine resources for their own gains.
On the other hand, the creative outputs of our people – literary, artistic, philosophical, technological-- are not being given immediate and strong attention. What about the intellectual writings? We seem to lack philosophical writings that will address our status as a people, writings that will point to us the way to living a fulfilled life. Instead we have pragmatic discourses, all devoted to analyzing and proffering solutions to problems which occur and recur all the time. How many Filipino inventions have been sold abroad thus benefiting other people instead of ours? Can’t we have the minds of Steve Jobs and bring about technological innovations ourselves? Our literary output are read by writers themselves, not by the ordinary folks. (I have been thinking, the Ani Journal should be put out, after being produced as a journal, as segregated sections printed in newsprint to make them accessible to the people at a cheap price. The CCP has to make its output available at popular prices and not be a counterpart of the MOMA in NYCor the Louvre Museum in Paris, France the products of which are affordable to the rich tourists.)
Actually, we need philosophy in life; we need to philosophize in order to make us abstract lessons from what is occurring in our daily lives. We should not even be afraid to philosophize, to look at our lives from a distance.
Right now, many religious and spiritual beliefs are competing for the attention of the people. Many use the various books to give an explanation to what is occurring in our midst. Actually all these beliefs give the people hope. Not one is teaching how to be a nihilist or someone destructive of one’s own life. (Unfortunately, those committing suicides have not heard or refuse to listen to them, which is a sad thing, really.) Instead they promise everlasting life, an enlightened life, nirvana or problem-free life, and many more. The most important thought in learning these beliefs is how to connect them to our realities and give justification for us to seek our dreams and destinies.
Hence, for those who are into advocacies, we need to rethink how to alter the minds of the people, how to make them conquer such thoughts, how to make them hold themselves up as a people whose destinies and dreams must be respected and allowed to be fulfilled. How do we do that?
First of all, the people must erase in their minds that other people should think for them. It is good to refer, confer, and seek advice from other people but ultimately it is they who should make the decisions. This means removing patriarchal mindsets that uphold power for power’s sake.
Secondly, the existence of certain institutions that foster obeisance or strengthen images of authoritarians must be challenged. Who are these authorities, by what right do they wield power – is it legitimate or il? Who held them up as authorities – by tradition, or by democratic choice? Are their powers directed to the good life of the people, or their own, and their families and relatives?
Thirdly, what are the methods, the ways by which we ourselves can influence the people so that they will take up the cudgels for their own destinies, make decisions major and minor as to where their lives will be leading to?
The mind of the people must be attuned to their own dreams and destinies. We must take care of their minds because otherwise they would be slaves forever to the forces who seek a hold on them and maintain their dominant positions forever, for good or ill.
Dreams and destinies are inherent in and are the rights of every individual. Those who deny others of these are being cruel; in fact those who kill people have already killed their right to take hold of their own lives.
Dreams contain our wishes of what we want to become, what we want to be in life. They provide us that impetus to go on living so that we may attain them. Once a person stops dreaming then he or she is a slave to the material life already. But so long as everyone dreams – wishing for attaining something that will fulfill their talents and skills and be of service in turn to the majority of the people – then they are living healthy lives.
Now destiny is that point where the individual has already done everything to be what he or she is, meaning to say, that is the summum bonum or that peak in one’s life whereby one can already say “I have attained it.”
Jose Rizal, our national hero attained the peak of his life, his dream of awakening the people through his writings, the Noli Me Tangere and the El Filibusterismo. It was his destiny to reveal to the world how the Filipino people lived under that period and so directed our history as a people to a life of independence. In the same way, when Miguel de Cervantes wrote Don Quijote de la Mancha, he also was saying something about the Spanish period in the 16th century. He was asking the readers to question the aristocracy and knighthood for their rational contributions to society. So also did Dostoyevsky write his novels, Crime and Punishment in Russia, in order to expose his society. Harriet Tubbman in the 18th century also wrote about slavery in the United States in order to expose it as inhuman and to make the government ban it forever.
Each of the authors above rose above their plain lives in order to create a dent on then hearts and minds of the people. They fulfilled their destinies maybe even without their meaning to, and so look at those societies and ours now.
Ninoy and Cory Cojuangco Aquino have already written their lives. Ninoy’s destiny was ended abruptly and thus was not able to see the obliteration of dictatorship in our country. Cory had the same vision of Ninoy and so was able to carry it out to fruition. However, side by side with her vision were the various collectives of people who had also a vision of where to go and how to attain it – by action together in unison to remove all vestiges of one-man military rule.
Unfortunately, our destiny to recover from that nightmarish period was cut short by the series of administrations which deflected the minds of the people from their own destinies. Here we see how certain individuals can do harm to the attainment of the people’s destiny.
So under PNoy, we need to be vigilant and see what he can do – as he said in his earliest speeches – “Puwede na tayong mangarap muli.” Six years is his term. And let us see what he can do to help shape the people’s destiny.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)